Essay about the arguments made by Charles Krauthammer

About the wrinkles made by Charles Krauthammer - Essay ExampleEventually, whether or not the student agree with Krauthammers argument go forth be explained.With regards to the issue on torture, Charles Krauthammer argues that utilitarianism behind torturing a person highly depends on the situation. For instance, torturing a person for no originator at all can be considered as something that is wrong or immoral. However, given that the situation is to choose between torturing a terrorist person who on purpose implanted a bomb with the purpose of killing thousands of bulk, Krauthammer argued that torturing the terrorist is the best thing to do in order to save the lives of the majority who are inculpable individuals. For this reason, he concludes that torture is not always impermissible (Shelly).Upon evaluating and equally judging the overall welfare of the people who are directly involved or touch with the action of whether or not to legally accept the act of torturing a terror ist person who has implanted a bomb, I agree with Krauthammers argument on the issue of torture in the sense that it would be best to torture one person who has a negative intention to hurt thousands of people by implanting a bomb than to let go of the bad person in exchange of losing thousands of life. Upon weighing pleasure and pain of allowing the implanted bomb to spark and kill thousands of people with the pleasure and pain of torturing the terrorist who implanted the bomb, the amount of pain give be so much greater than the pain that will result out of torturing the terrorist man who implanted the bomb.When we talk about utility, we are actually referring to an act which could result to greatest happiness. Based on the greatest happiness principle, it is right to do action that will promote happiness as a consequence of the act and wrong if the action could let unhappiness (The University of Adelaide Library). Happiness means people should enjoy the benefit of having